Rucker
(PS) Tafari v. Rucker
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAS HEZEKIAH TAFARI, No. 2:22-cv-01666-DAD-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING
YVETTE RUCKER, et al., PLAINTIFF’S RULE 60 MOTION Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 17, 21) 16 Plaintiff Ras Hezekiah Tafari, proceeding pro se, initiated this civil action on September 22, 2022. (Doc. No. 1.) This action was dismissed on April 3, 2024 due to plaintiff’s failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. (Doc. No. 10.) On October 17, 2024, plaintiff filed a Rule 60 motion for relief from judgment. (Doc. No. 17.) This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. (Doc. No. 18.) On November 20, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s Rule 60 motion for relief from judgment be denied. (Doc. No. 21.) Specifically, the magistrate judge found that…