Birtwell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL HARRISON, No. 2:24-cv-1413 DC CSK P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS BIRTWELL, et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed August 5, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. (ECF No. 8.) On October 28, 2024, plaintiff filed a motion to stay, which was denied on November 7, 2024. (ECF Nos. 12, 13.) Instead, plaintiff was granted an additional sixty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 13.) Sixty days from that date have now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the Court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within…