Tuggle

(HC) Wright v. Tuggle

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20252:24-cv-01953California919 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL WRIGHT, Case No. 2:24-cv-01953-DC-CKD (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

J. TUGGLE, HABEAS PETITION Respondent. (Doc. No. 6) 16 Petitioner Michael Wright is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 5, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending this action be summarily dismissed because Petitioner’s parole- related claims do not state any claim upon which relief can be granted. (Doc. No. 6.) Specifically, although Petitioner challenges the fact that he was denied parole, the magistrate judge found Petitioner did not allege he was denied an opportunity to be heard at a parole proceeding, and he did not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.