Bagal

Bagal v. Sawant

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 21, 202524-1488California1,109 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 21 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ABHIJIT BAGAL, No. 24-1488 Case No: 2:23-0721-RAJ Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

KSHAMA SAWANT, et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Richard A. Jones, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 16, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: TALLMAN, FRIEDLAND, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Abhijit Bagal (“Appellant”) appeals the district court’s dismissal of his

constitutional claims against two former Seattle City Council Members and the

current Mayor of Seattle (“Appellees”). Appellant, a resident of North Carolina and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). practicing Hindu, asserts a facial challenge to the City of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.