Windsor

Windsor v. Does 1-10 CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 2025A167006California3,858 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

A. The Statutory Text In relevant part, section 128.5 states: “(a) A trial court may order a party, the party’s attorney, or both, to pay the reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, incurred by another party as a result of actions or tactics, made in bad faith, that are frivolous or solely intended to cause unnecessary delay. . . . [¶] . . . [¶] “(f) Sanctions ordered pursuant to this section shall be ordered pursuant to the following conditions and procedures: “(1) If, after notice and a reasonable opportunity to respond, the court issues an order pursuant to subdivision (a), the court may, subject to the conditions stated below, impose an appropriate sanction upon the party, the party’s attorneys, or both, for an action or tactic described in subdivision (a). In determining what sanctions, if any, should be ordered, the court shall consider whether a party seeking sanctions has exercised due diligence. “(A) A motion for sanctions under this section shall be made separately from other motions or requests and shall describe the specific alleged action or tactic, made in bad faith, that is frivolous or solely intended to cause unnecessary delay. “(B) If…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.