United States v. Klamath Drainage District

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 22, 202523-3404California1,196 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 22 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-3404 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:22-cv-00962-CL v.

MEMORANDUM*

KLAMATH DRAINAGE DISTRICT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Mark D. Clarke, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 17, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: H.A. THOMAS and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges, and BOLTON, District Judge.***

Klamath Drainage District (“KDD”) appeals the district court’s grant of

summary judgment for the United States Bureau of Reclamation (“Reclamation”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Susan R. Bolton, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. and injunction in a suit for breach of contract. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.