McHenry

Moreno Bueno v. McHenry

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 22, 202523-3317California591 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JAN 22 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN MORENO BUENO; ANDREA No. 23-3317

VILLAVISENCIO PACAYA; NICOLAS

MORENO VILLAVISENCIO, Agency Nos.

A241-735-124

Petitioners, A241-735-125

A241-735-126

v.

JAMES R. MCHENRY III, Acting Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 13, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: TASHIMA, RAWLINSON, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Juan Moreno Bueno (Moreno Bueno), his wife Andrea

Villavisencio-Pacaya, and their minor son, natives and citizens of Peru, petition for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2)(C). review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board). The

Board dismissed Petitioners’ appeal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.