Matias-Pablo
Matias-Pablo v. McHenry
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 22, 202523-4119California433 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 22 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DOMINGA MATIAS-PABLO, et al., No. 23-4119 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A201-768-384
A201-768-385
v.
JAMES R. MCHENRY III, Acting Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 17, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: TALLMAN, FRIEDLAND, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.
Lead Petitioner1 Dominga Matias-Pablo, native and citizen of Guatemala,
seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order affirming the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Petitioners consist of Dominga Matias-Pablo and her minor son. denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against
Torture (“CAT”). We review the agency’s factual findings for…