Matias-Pablo

Matias-Pablo v. McHenry

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 22, 202523-4119California433 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 22 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DOMINGA MATIAS-PABLO, et al., No. 23-4119 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A201-768-384

A201-768-385

v.

JAMES R. MCHENRY III, Acting Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 17, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: TALLMAN, FRIEDLAND, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Lead Petitioner1 Dominga Matias-Pablo, native and citizen of Guatemala,

seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order affirming the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 Petitioners consist of Dominga Matias-Pablo and her minor son. denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against

Torture (“CAT”). We review the agency’s factual findings for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.