McHenry

Diaz Carrillo v. McHenry

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 22, 202523-4141California690 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 22 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-4141

JEFFERSON ANDRE DIAZ

CARRILLO; GIA MIKAELA DIAZ

Agency Nos. 241-669-807

RAMIREZ; ANDREA ELIZABETH

241-669-808

RAMIREZ ZAPATA,

241-669-809 Petitioners,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

JAMES R. MCHENRY III, Acting Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 16, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: H.A. THOMAS, MENDOZA, Circuit Judges, and BOLTON, District Judge.***

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Susan R. Bolton, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. 1 Petitioners are a family of three citizens of Peru. They petition for review of

a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying their motion to

reopen. Because the parties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.