McHenry
Diaz Carrillo v. McHenry
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 22, 202523-4141California690 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 22 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-4141
JEFFERSON ANDRE DIAZ
CARRILLO; GIA MIKAELA DIAZ
Agency Nos. 241-669-807
RAMIREZ; ANDREA ELIZABETH
241-669-808
RAMIREZ ZAPATA,
241-669-809 Petitioners,
MEMORANDUM*
v.
JAMES R. MCHENRY III, Acting Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 16, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: H.A. THOMAS, MENDOZA, Circuit Judges, and BOLTON, District Judge.***
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Susan R. Bolton, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. 1 Petitioners are a family of three citizens of Peru. They petition for review of
a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying their motion to
reopen. Because the parties…