Bruno Zavala-Resendiz v. James McHenry

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 22, 202518-70616California1,302 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 22 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRUNO EDUARDO ZAVALA- No. 18-70616 RESENDIZ, Agency No.

A073-384-148

Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

JAMES R. MCHENRY III, Acting Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 4, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before COLLINS, VANDYKE, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision

dismissing his appeal of the immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of his number- and

time-barred motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). deny in part and dismiss in part the petition.

The court reviews the denial of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.