Bruno Zavala-Resendiz v. James McHenry
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 22, 202518-70616California1,302 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 22 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BRUNO EDUARDO ZAVALA- No. 18-70616 RESENDIZ, Agency No.
A073-384-148
Petitioner,
v. MEMORANDUM*
JAMES R. MCHENRY III, Acting Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 4, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before COLLINS, VANDYKE, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision
dismissing his appeal of the immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of his number- and
time-barred motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). deny in part and dismiss in part the petition.