Curtis

Curtis v. Vigil CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 2025F088567California5,287 words

Opinion

Opinion

Santos, J.

Filed 1/22/25 Curtis v. Vigil CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

CHRISTOPHER CURTIS,

F088567

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. BDA-16-003486) v.

AMANDA VIGIL, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Kern County. Cynthia L. Loo, Judge. Amanda Vigil, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant. Christopher Curtis, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Respondent. -ooOoo- In this child custody dispute between Amanda Vigil (mother) and Christopher Curtis (father) concerning their nine-year-old daughter, A.C. (daughter), mother appeals from a family court order granting the parents joint legal and physical custody of daughter, with primary custody awarded to mother, and giving father…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.