Optiflex Properties and Development v. Duh CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 2025D084670California5,868 words

Opinion

Opinion

Buchanan, J.

Filed 1/22/25 Optiflex Properties and Development v. Duh CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

OPTIFLEX PROPERTIES AND D084670

DEVELOPMENT, LLC,

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. PSC1804914) v.

RURNG LARN DUH et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County, Kira L. Klatchko, Judge. Affirmed. Law Offices of Roger C. Hsu, Roger C. Hsu and Gurgen Sargsyan, for Appellants Rurng Larn Duh, Samuel Chiang, and Shyh Haw Wu. Daniel King for Appellants Lorraine’s Investment LLC, AT Financial LLC, and Archiwest Investment LLC. Lew Law Firm and Bill W. Lew for Respondent. Defendants Rurng Larn Duh, Samuel Chiang, and Shyh Haw Wu (individual defendants) and Lorraine’s Investment LLC, AT Financial LLC,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.