Bailey

Filed 1/22/25 Bailey v. San Francisco District Attorney’s Office CA1/1 Opinion on remand from Supreme Court

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

TWANDA BAILEY,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A153520

v.

SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT

ATTORNEY’S OFFICE et al., (San Francisco City & County Super. Ct. No. CGC-15-549675) Defendants and Respondents.

This case is before us on remand after our Supreme Court clarified issues pertaining to race harassment and retaliation claims actionable under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA).1 The high court’s principal ruling was that a coworker’s one-time use of a racial epithet can create a “hostile work environment” and whether it does so, requires an examination of “the totality of the circumstances”…