Margiotta

Margiotta v. UBS Financial Services CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 2025B322555California3,547 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/22/25 Margiotta v. UBS Financial Services CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

MICHAEL MARGIOTTA, B322555

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 22STCP01100) v.

UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Upinder S. Kalra, Judge. Affirmed. Zarmi Law and David Zarmi for Plaintiff and Appellant. Keesal, Young & Logan and Elizabeth H. Lindh for Defendant and Respondent.

‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ Appellant Michael Margiotta was employed by respondent UBS Financial Services, Inc. (UBS) for approximately seven years. As part of Margiotta’s benefits package, UBS made Margiotta four…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.