Margiotta
Margiotta v. UBS Financial Services CA2/3
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 1/22/25 Margiotta v. UBS Financial Services CA2/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
MICHAEL MARGIOTTA, B322555
Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 22STCP01100) v.
UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.,
Defendant and Respondent.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Upinder S. Kalra, Judge. Affirmed. Zarmi Law and David Zarmi for Plaintiff and Appellant. Keesal, Young & Logan and Elizabeth H. Lindh for Defendant and Respondent.
‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ Appellant Michael Margiotta was employed by respondent UBS Financial Services, Inc. (UBS) for approximately seven years. As part of Margiotta’s benefits package, UBS made Margiotta four…