McHenry

Sanchez Sanchez v. McHenry

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 22, 202523-2370California1,320 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 22 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LETICIA SANCHEZ SANCHEZ, No. 23-2370 Agency No. Petitioner, A215-816-676 v.

MEMORANDUM*

JAMES R. MCHENRY III, Acting Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 17, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: TALLMAN, FRIEDLAND, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Leticia Sanchez Sanchez (Sanchez) is a native of Mexico. She

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) final order of

removal, in which the BIA affirmed the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) decision denying

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the

Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.