Brinker

Brinker v. Axos Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20253:22-cv-00386California3,461 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JENNIFER BREAR BRINKER, Case No.: 22-cv-0386-MMA-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER OVERRULING

v. PLAINTIFF’S RULE 72 OBJECTION

AXOS BANK, et al., [Doc. No. 173]

Defendants. 16 JOHN TOLLA, et al., 17 Counter-Claimants, 18 v.

JENNIFER BREAR BRINKER,

20 Counter-Defendant. 21 22 On October 31, 2024, Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner issued a Discovery Order denying in part Plaintiff Jennifer Brear Brinker’s motion to compel. See Doc. No. 164 (“Discovery Order”). Plaintiff now objects to the Discovery Order to the extent Judge Leshner denied Plaintiff’s request that the Court compel further testimony from Eshel Bar-Adon regarding the factual and legal basis for Defendants Axos Bank’s and John Tolla’s (collectively, “Defendants”) counterclaims. Doc. No. 173. Defendants filed a response in opposition to the objection, to which Plaintiff replied. See Doc. Nos. 176, 180. For the reasons set forth below,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.