Mewawalla

Mewawalla v. Middleman

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20253:21-cv-09700California2,309 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RAHUL MEWAWALLA, Case No. 21-cv-09700-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: JURY INSTRUCTIONS

v.

STANLEY C. MIDDLEMAN, et al., Docket Nos. 233, 266 Defendants.

12 The Court largely accepts Parties’ stipulated instructions at Docket No. 233. At the pretrial conference, the Court ordered Parties to further meet and confer to stipulate to a single updated, “Unclean Hands” instruction, and updated Breach of Contract Instructions Nos. 33 & 34 that include a cite to the section of the Employment Agreement with the definition of “Cause.” The Parties submitted a joint submission at Docket No. 266. Accordingly, the Court rules as follows on the following Disputed Instructions: 28, 35, 38, 39, 40, 411. Attached to this Order are the Court’s overall proposed jury instructions. The instructions are based on model instructions, agreement by the Parties, and contain minor modifications previously used by this Court in other cases. The Court has made slight…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.