Sheldon

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8

JEFFREY THEODORE SHELDON,

9 Case No. 24-cv-01874-AMO (PR) Plaintiff, 10 v. ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT 11 PREJUDICE

SAN QUENTIN STAFF,

12 Defendants. 13

14 On November 15, 2024, the Court issued an Order of Dismissal with Leave to Amend. 15 Specifically, the Court granted Plaintiff Jeffrey Theodore Sheldon twenty-eight days from the date 16 of the Order to file an amended complaint to allege facts sufficient to state a cognizable 17 constitutional claim. Sheldon was warned that the failure to timely file an amended complaint 18 would result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. The time for Sheldon to file 19 his amended complaint has passed, and no amended complaint has been filed. Taking into 20 account the salient factors set forth in Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992), the 21 Court finds that dismissal is warranted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).1 See Yourish 22 v. Cal. Amplifier,…