Myers
Myers v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 AMELIA MYERS, et al., Case No. 24-cv-02668-AMO Plaintiffs, 8
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
9 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS AND/OR STAY
10 GILEAD SCIENCES, INC, et al., PROCEEDINGS 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 27 12 13 This is a putative class action brought by Plaintiffs Amelia Myers and Fatoumata Barry 14 Yapo against their former employers, Defendants Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Kite Pharma, Inc. 15 Myers and Yapo allege that Gilead and Kite Pharma utilized the wrong rate of pay to calculate 16 overtime pay, and thus underpaid overtime in violation of state and federal law. Before the Court 17 is Defendants’ motion to dismiss and/or stay, which was heard on December 19, 2024.1 Having 18 read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered the arguments therein and those made 19 at the hearing, as well as relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS IN PART AND 20 DENIES IN PART Defendants’ motion to dismiss and/or stay for the reasons…