Myers

Myers v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20253:24-cv-02668California4,529 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AMELIA MYERS, et al., Case No. 24-cv-02668-AMO Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS AND/OR STAY

GILEAD SCIENCES, INC, et al., PROCEEDINGS Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 27 12 This is a putative class action brought by Plaintiffs Amelia Myers and Fatoumata Barry Yapo against their former employers, Defendants Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Kite Pharma, Inc. Myers and Yapo allege that Gilead and Kite Pharma utilized the wrong rate of pay to calculate overtime pay, and thus underpaid overtime in violation of state and federal law. Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss and/or stay, which was heard on December 19, 2024. Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered the arguments therein and those made at the hearing, as well as relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendants’ motion to dismiss and/or stay for the reasons…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.