Westerman

Westerman v. FTI Consulting, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20253:24-cv-04118California1,819 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD WESTERMAN,

Case No. 24-cv-04118-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO TRANSFER OR, IN THE FTI CONSULTING, INC., et al., ALTERNATIVE, TO STAY 10 Defendants. REDACTED

Re: Dkt. Nos. 22,

13 I. INTRODUCTION On December 18, 2024, Defendant FTI Consulting, Inc. and FTI Consulting LLC (collectively, “FTI”) brought a Motion to Transfer or, in the Alternative, to Stay (“Motion”), asking the Court to transfer this action to the District Court for the District of Columbia (“the D.C. Court”), where an action previously filed by FTI against the plaintiff in this case, Edward Westerman, is pending. See dkt. no. 68, Request for Judicial Notice, Exhibit B (FTI Consulting, Inc. v. Edward Westerman, No. 1:24-cv-01055 (D.D.C., filed Apr. 12, 2024) (“D.C. Action”)). Alternatively, FTI asks the Court to stay this case pending resolution of the D.C. Action. The …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.