Rudas
(PC) Serrano v. Rudas
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRES MASQUEDA SERRANO, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00950-KES-CDB Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO COMPEL
v. (Doc. 40) ROBERT RUDAS, et al., Defendants.
16 Plaintiff Andres Masqueda Serrano is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendant Rudas for violations of Plaintiff’s constitutional rights. I. INTRODUCTION On July 10, 2024, the Court issued its Discovery and Scheduling Order. (Doc. 29.) On December 2, 2024, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Motion for Order Compelling Discovery.” (Doc. 40.) Defendant filed an opposition on December 10, 2024. (Doc. 41.) II. DISCUSSION Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (Doc. 40) Plaintiff seeks an order compelling Defendant to respond to interrogatories served October 13, 2024. Further, Plaintiff seeks an order requiring Defendant “to pay Court the sum of reasonable expenses in…