Rudas
(PC) Serrano v. Rudas
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANDRES MASQUEDA SERRANO, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00950-KES-CDB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO COMPEL
13 v. (Doc. 40) 14 ROBERT RUDAS, et al., 15 Defendants.
16 17 Plaintiff Andres Masqueda Serrano is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 18 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendant Rudas for 19 violations of Plaintiff’s constitutional rights. 20 I. INTRODUCTION 21 On July 10, 2024, the Court issued its Discovery and Scheduling Order. (Doc. 29.) 22 On December 2, 2024, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Motion for Order Compelling 23 Discovery.” (Doc. 40.) Defendant filed an opposition on December 10, 2024. (Doc. 41.) 24 II. DISCUSSION 25 Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (Doc. 40) 26 Plaintiff seeks an order compelling Defendant to respond to interrogatories served October 27 13, 2024. Further, Plaintiff seeks an order requiring Defendant “to pay Court the sum of reasonable expenses in…