Naseri

Naseri v. City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20253:24-cv-05413California5,731 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ZAHIR NASERI, Case No. 24-cv-05413-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN Re: Dkt. No.

FRANCISCO,

11 Defendant. 12 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendant City and County of San Francisco’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 37. Plaintiff Zahir Naseri filed an Opposition (ECF No. 38) and Defendant filed a Reply (ECF No. 39). The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the January 23, 2025 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motion.1 II. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Zahir Naseri has worked as a “TNC” (transportation network company) driver for Uber and Lyft in the San Francisco Bay Area for almost nine years, including in the City and County of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.