Joshua Cahill v. Marriott International, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20252:24-cv-05065California1,655 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA CAHILL, Case No. 2:24-cv-05065-FLA (JCx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REMAND [DKT. 21]

MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

15 et al., 16 Defendants.

18 19

21 22

25 26

28 RULING Before the court is Plaintiff Joshua Cahill’s (“Cahill” or “Plaintiff”) Motion to Remand (“Motion”) (Dkt. 21, “Mot.”). Defendants Marriott International, Inc. (“MII”) and Residence Inn by Marriott, LLC (“RIBM”) (collectively “Defendants”) oppose the motion. Dkt. 22 (“Opp’n”). On August 14, 2024, the court found this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument and vacated the hearing set for August 16, 2024. Dkt. 28; see Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Local Rule 7-15. For the reasons stated below, the court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion in its entirety. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this action against Defendants in Santa Barbara Superior Court,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.