NnaDozie Dike v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20252:24-cv-05394California4,449 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NNADOZIE DIKÉ, Case No. 2:24CV5394-KK-AJR

12 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] v. 13 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

ORDER

14 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17

18 1. GENERAL 19 1.1 Purposes and Limitations. Discovery in this action is likely to involve 20 production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special 21 protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting 22 this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and 23 petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties 24 acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or 25 responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and 26 use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential 27 treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.