Reid

Reid v. City Of Oakland

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20254:25-cv-00383California221 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LAJUANA A. REID, Case No. 25-cv-00383-TSH Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

? v. AMEND CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 7-8 Defendants. 12 On January 21, 2025, Plaintiff LaJuana Reid filed two documents: (1) “Amendment to || Defendants Section,” ECF No. 7; and (2) “Errata to Page 28,” ECF No. 8. As Plaintiff filed these documents in ECF as motions to amend, the Court construes them as a motion to file a second a || amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. Good cause appearing, the || Court GRANTS Plaintiff's request. Plaintiff shall file her Second Amended Complaint as a S || separate docket entry. The Court advises plaintiff that “an amended complaint supercedes the || original complaint and renders it without legal effect.” Lacey v. Maricopa County, 693 F.3d 896, 927 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc). As such, all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.