Reid

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 LAJUANA A. REID, Case No. 25-cv-00383-TSH 8 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

? v. AMEND 10 CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 7-8 11 Defendants. 12 5 13 On January 21, 2025, Plaintiff LaJuana Reid filed two documents: (1) “Amendment to 14 || Defendants Section,” ECF No. 7; and (2) “Errata to Page 28,” ECF No. 8. As Plaintiff filed these 3 15 documents in ECF as motions to amend, the Court construes them as a motion to file a second a 16 || amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. Good cause appearing, the 3 17 || Court GRANTS Plaintiff's request. Plaintiff shall file her Second Amended Complaint as a S 18 || separate docket entry. The Court advises plaintiff that “an amended complaint supercedes the 19 || original complaint and renders it without legal effect.” Lacey v. Maricopa County, 693 F.3d 896, 20 927 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc). As such, all…