Ashcroft v. Southern California Permanente Medical Group

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20253:24-cv-00035California5,015 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 SHARRY ASHCROFT, Case No. 24-cv-0035-MMA-MMP

14 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

15 v. MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT

16 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 17 PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, [Doc. No. 25] et al., 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 On October 31, 2024, Defendant Southern California Permanente Medical Group 23 (“Defendant”), filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff Sherry Ashcroft’s (“Plaintiff”) second 24 amended complaint. Doc. No. 25. Plaintiff filed a response in opposition, to which 25 Defendant replied. Doc Nos. 26–27. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) 26 and Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1, the Court took this matter under submission on December 27 10, 2024. Doc. No. 28. For the reasons herein, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion 28 and DISMISSES Plaintiff’s second amended complaint. 1 I. BACKGROUND 2 Defendant, a private health care organization, employed Plaintiff as an office 3 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.