Briggs
Briggs v. San Diego Unified Port District
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Case No.: 24-cv-239-DMS-VET
CORY J. BRIGGS,
12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 13 v. MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO RULE 12(b)(1) 14 SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT
DISTRICT; and DOES 1 through 100, 15 Defendants. 16
17 18 Pending before the Court is Defendant San Diego Unified Port District’s 19 (“SDUPD”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) 20 and 12(b)(6). (Defendant’s Motion, ECF No. 5). Plaintiff filed a response in opposition 21 on August 30, 2024. (Plaintiff’s Opposition, ECF No. 8). Defendant SDUPD filed its 22 reply on September 13, 2024. (Defendant’s Reply, ECF No. 9). The Court found this 23 matter to be suitable for resolution without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 24 7.1(d)(1). (ECF No. 10). For the following reasons, the Court grants Defendant’s motion 25 to dismiss on 12(b)(1) grounds and dismisses Plaintiff’s Complaint without…