Briggs

Briggs v. San Diego Unified Port District

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20253:24-cv-00239California3,629 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 24-cv-239-DMS-VET

CORY J. BRIGGS,

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO RULE 12(b)(1) SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT

DISTRICT; and DOES 1 through 100, 15 Defendants.

17 Pending before the Court is Defendant San Diego Unified Port District’s (“SDUPD”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). (Defendant’s Motion, ECF No. 5). Plaintiff filed a response in opposition on August 30, 2024. (Plaintiff’s Opposition, ECF No. 8). Defendant SDUPD filed its reply on September 13, 2024. (Defendant’s Reply, ECF No. 9). The Court found this matter to be suitable for resolution without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). (ECF No. 10). For the following reasons, the Court grants Defendant’s motion to dismiss on 12(b)(1) grounds and dismisses Plaintiff’s Complaint without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.