Mark Mearl Bowersock v. Daniel B. Feldstern

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20252:24-cv-08322California981 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 24-8322 MRA (AS) Date January 21, 2025 Title Mark Mearl Bowersock, v. Daniel B. Feldstern

Present: The Honorable Alka Sagar, United States Magistrate Judge Alma Felix N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant:

N/A N/A

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On September 23, 2024, Mark Mearl Bowersock (“Plaintiff”), a California inmate proceeding pro se, filed a paid Civil Rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Complaint”) against Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Daniel B. Feldstern in his individual and official capacities. (Dkt. No. 1). The Complaint alleges Plaintiff was denied his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights when Judge Feldstern made certain rulings against Plaintiff, including denying Plaintiff’ s request for judicial notice.' (Complaint at 8-14 (as paginated on the Court’s electronic docket)). Plaintiff seeks…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.