Hunter

Hunter v. Petro-Lud, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20251:24-cv-00181California491 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 CLEO HUNTER, individually and on behalf Case No. 1:24-cv-00181-KES-CDB of all others similarly situated,

12

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

Plaintiff,

SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR

13

PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO COMPLY

v.

WITH THE COURT’S ORDERS AND

14

FAILURE TO FILE MOTION FOR CLASS

PETRO-LUD, INC.

CERTIFICATION

15

Defendant.

FIVE-DAY DEADLINE

16 17 18 Plaintiff Cleo Hunter initiated this action on behalf of himself and a putative class with 19 the filing of a complaint on February 8, 2024. (Doc. 1). On May 6, 2024, the Court issued a 20 scheduling order setting the deadline to file the motion for class certification no later than 21 January 17, 2025. (Doc. 15). Subsequently, the Court denied the parties’ stipulation to extend 22 this and other case maangement deadlines by 90 days. (Doc. 20). Plaintiff has failed to file the 23 motion for class certification by the deadline or otherwise made a filing explaining the 24 delinquency. 25 The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, provide: 26 “Failure of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.