Campbell
Campbell v. CubeSmart, L.P.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STEPHANIE CAMPBELL, Case No.: 24-cv-02282-AJB-VET 12 Plaintiff, ORDER: 13 v. (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 14
MOTION TO REMAND;
15 CUBESMART, L.P.; TRACEY
HEYWOOD; KEIM MICUCCI; (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
16
FRANKIE LILES; ARTHUR SALAIZ; MOTION TO COMPEL
17 BRYAN HARRIS; ERIN DIMARCO; ARBITRATION and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 18 Defendants. 19 (Doc. Nos. 7, 9) 20 21 Before the Court are Plaintiff Stephanie Campbell’s motion to remand (Doc. No. 9), 22 and Defendant CubeSmart, L.P.’s motion to compel arbitration and stay action (Doc. No. 23 7). The matters have been fully briefed. (Doc. Nos. 11–14.) Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 24 7.1.d.1, the Court finds the instant matters suitable for determination on the papers and 25 without oral argument. Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES the hearing currently 26 set for February 27, 2025. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s 27 28 1 motion to remand, and GRANTS…