Goodlow

Goodlow v. Estrada

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20253:24-cv-01490California3,211 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IVAN F. GOODLOW, Case No.: 24-cv-1490-AJB-SBC

CDCR # AX3970,

12

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 (1) GRANTING MOTION TO vs. 14 PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

K. ESTRADA, A. LEWIS, MS. REESE, (Doc. No. 2); AND

15 Defendants. (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR 16 FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM 17 PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) AND 1915A(b) 18

19 20 I. INTRODUCTION 21 Plaintiff Ivan Goodlow (“Plaintiff” or “Goodlow”), currently state inmate 22 proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, along 23 with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (See Doc. Nos. 1, 2.) In his Complaint, 24 Plaintiff alleges that while he was confined at R. J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”), 25 Defendants violated his constitutional rights by using excessive force against him and 26 falsifying disciplinary reports. (See generally, Doc. No. 1.) For the reasons discussed 27 below, the …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.