(PC) Ford v. Williams
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 9 MARCEL D. FORD, Case No. 1:24-cv-00532 JLT EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S IFP
v. APPLICATION BE DENIED AND THAT
PLAINTIFF BE REQUIRED TO PAY THE
SLYVESTER WILLIAMS, FILING FEE IN FULL IF HE WANTS TO
PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION
Defendant. 14 (ECF No. 7)
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
THIRTY DAYS
16 Plaintiff Marcel D. Ford is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this action filed on May 6, 2024. (ECF No. 1). On July 19, 2024, Plaintiff also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis in this action. (ECF No. 7). Because the Court concludes that Plaintiff had at least three “strikes” prior to filing this action and because he was not in imminent danger of serious physical injury at the time he filed it, the Court will recommend that Plaintiff be required to pay the $405 filing fee in full if he wants to proceed with the action. I. THREE-STRIKES PROVISION OF 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) Pertinent here is the so called “three…