White

White v. Capital One

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20251:24-cv-00633California1,099 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

DOLORES WHITE,

10 Case No. 1:24-cv-00633-SKO Plaintiff, 11 ORDER VACATING HEARING AND v. DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 12 STAY DISCOVERY AS PREMATURE

CAPITAL ONE, N.A., et al., 13 (Doc. 25) Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Defendants Capital One and Mary Dickins (“Defendants”)’ 16 “Motion to Stay Discovery,” filed December 27, 2024. (Doc. 25). Pursuant to Local Rule 251, the 17 parties submitted their “Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement – Defendants Capital One 18 N.A.’s and Mary Dickins’ Motion to Stay Discovery” (the “Joint Statement”) on January 15, 2025. 19 (Doc. 27) 20 After having reviewed the Joint Statement, the Court deems the motion suitable for decision 21 without oral argument, and hearing set for January 29, 2025, will be vacated. For the reasons set 22 forth below, the motion is premature and shall be denied without prejudice. 23 I. BACKGROUND 24 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.