(SS) Acevedo Gomez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20251:24-cv-00657California445 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BALDEMAR ACEVEDO GOMEZ, Case No. 1:24-cv-00657-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’

STIPULATED MOTION TO REMAND

v. UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), REVERSING FINAL DECISION AND COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL REMANDING CASE1

SECURITY,

(Doc. No. 19) Defendant. ORDER MOOTING PLAINTIFF’S

AMENDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT (Doc. No. 15) 19 Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to remand filed January 21, 2025. (Doc. No. 19). Plaintiff Baldemar Acevedo Gomez and the Commissioner of Social Security agree that this case should be remanded for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Id.). The United States Supreme Court held that the Social Security Act permits remand in conjunction with a judgment either affirming, reversing, or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.