(SS) Acevedo Gomez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BALDEMAR ACEVEDO GOMEZ, Case No. 1:24-cv-00657-HBK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’
STIPULATED MOTION TO REMAND
13 v. UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), REVERSING FINAL DECISION AND 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL REMANDING CASE1
SECURITY,
15 (Doc. No. 19) Defendant. 16 ORDER MOOTING PLAINTIFF’S
AMENDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY
17 JUDGMENT 18 (Doc. No. 15) 19 20 Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to remand filed January 21, 2025. 21 (Doc. No. 19). Plaintiff Baldemar Acevedo Gomez and the Commissioner of Social Security 22 agree that this case should be remanded for further administrative proceedings under sentence 23 four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Id.). 24 The United States Supreme Court held that the Social Security Act permits remand in 25 conjunction with a judgment either affirming, reversing, or…