Rakofsky

Rakofsky v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20255:22-cv-04427California3,351 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 JOSEPH RAKOFSKY, Case No. 22-cv-04427-EJD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS FIRST AMENDED

10 v. COMPLAINT 11 MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, et al., Re: ECF Nos. 51, 52 Defendants. 12 13 Before the Court are two motions to dismiss Plaintiff Joseph Rakofsky’s First Amended 14 Complaint (“FAC,” ECF No. 50). Euromotors Monterey, Inc., dba Mercedes-Benz of Monterey1, 15 Wienik Bleyenberg, and Devon Thomson’s Motion to Dismiss (the “Dealership Defendants”), 16 ECF No. 51; Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (“MBUSA”)’s2 Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 52. 17 After carefully reviewing the documents, the Court found this matter suitable for decision 18 without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the 19 Court GRANTS the Motions to Dismiss. 20 I. BACKGROUND 21 A. Factual Allegations 22 The Court provided a detailed description of the factual allegations in its prior order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.