Rakofsky

Rakofsky v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20255:22-cv-04427California3,351 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 JOSEPH RAKOFSKY, Case No. 22-cv-04427-EJD Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS FIRST AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, et al., Re: ECF Nos. 51, 52 Defendants. 12 Before the Court are two motions to dismiss Plaintiff Joseph Rakofsky’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC,” ECF No. 50). Euromotors Monterey, Inc., dba Mercedes-Benz of Monterey1, Wienik Bleyenberg, and Devon Thomson’s Motion to Dismiss (the “Dealership Defendants”), ECF No. 51; Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (“MBUSA”)’s2 Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 52. After carefully reviewing the documents, the Court found this matter suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the Motions to Dismiss. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Allegations The Court provided a detailed description of the factual allegations in its prior order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.