Laatz
Laatz v. Zazzle, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 NICKY LAATZ, et al., Case No. 5:22-cv-04844-BLF
8 Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
9 v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
UNDER SEAL
10 ZAZZLE, INC., et al., [Re: ECF 309] 11 Defendants.
12 Before the Court is Defendants Zazzle Inc. (“Zazzle”) and Mohamed Alkhatib’s 13 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (collectively, “Defendants”), filed in connection with 14 their Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief From Nondispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate 15 Judge (Dkt. No. 288). ECF No. 309. Plaintiff did not submit any response to Defendants’ motion. 16 Having reviewed Defendants’ submissions and applicable sealing law, the Court GRANTS 17 Defendants’ requests to seal. 18 I. LEGAL STANDARD 19 “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records and 20 documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447…