Laatz

Laatz v. Zazzle, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20255:22-cv-04844California1,458 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 NICKY LAATZ, et al., Case No. 5:22-cv-04844-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE

UNDER SEAL

ZAZZLE, INC., et al., [Re: ECF 309] Defendants.

Before the Court is Defendants Zazzle Inc. (“Zazzle”) and Mohamed Alkhatib’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (collectively, “Defendants”), filed in connection with their Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief From Nondispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 288). ECF No. 309. Plaintiff did not submit any response to Defendants’ motion. Having reviewed Defendants’ submissions and applicable sealing law, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ requests to seal. I. LEGAL STANDARD “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.