Mora
Mora v. Black Horse Capital Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 NATASHA MORA, Case No.: 3:25-cv-00017-RBM-AHG
11 Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING EX PARTE
12 v. APPLICATION TO RESCIND
POSTJUDGMENT LOCKOUT
13 BLACK HORSE CAPITAL INC., et al.,
14 Defendants. [Doc. 6]
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Natasha Mora’s (“Plaintiff”) Ex Parte 22 Application to Rescind Post Judgment Lockout against Defendant San Diego Sheriff’s 23 Department and Defendant Sheriff Kelly A. Martinez (the “Sheriff Defendants” or the 24 “Sheriff”)1 (the “Ex Parte Application”). (Doc. 6.) In support of her Ex Parte Application, 25 Plaintiff filed: (i) the Eviction Restoration Notice (Doc. 6-1); (ii) a Minute Order in the 26
27 1 Defendant San Diego Sheriff’s Department is now known as the San Diego County 28 1 unlawful detainer proceeding (Doc. 6-2); (iii) the declaration of attorney Marc Applbaum 2 (Doc. 6-3, “Applbaum Declaration” or “Applbaum Decl.”); and (iv) the declaration of 3 Plaintiff…