Laatz

Laatz v. Zazzle, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20255:22-cv-04844California1,178 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 NICKY LAATZ, et al., Case No. 5:22-cv-04844-BLF

8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO

9 v. CONSIDER WHETHER

DEFENDANTS’ MATERIALS SHOULD

10 ZAZZLE, INC., et al., BE SEALED 11 Defendants. [Re: ECF 312, 316]

12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Nicky Laatz’s (“Plaintiff”) Administrative Motion to Consider 13 Whether Defendants’ Materials Should be Sealed, filed in connection with her Objections to 14 Defendants’ Opposition to her Motion for Relief From Nondispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate 15 Judge (Dkt. No. 288). ECF 312. Defendants Zazzle Inc. (“Zazzle”) and Mohamed Alkhatib’s 16 (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a statement in support of sealing the materials identified in 17 Plaintiff’s motion. ECF 316. Plaintiff did not submit any response to Defendants’ statement in 18 support of sealing. 19 Having reviewed the Parties’ submissions and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.