Randall Coleman v. Carlos Arce

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20252:24-cv-10423California1,104 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 24-10423 JLS (PVC) Date: January 22, 2025 Title Randall Coleman v. Carlos Arce, Acting Warden

Present: The Honorable Pedro V. Castillo, United States Magistrate Judge

Marlene Ramirez None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent: None None

PROCEEDINGS: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

MAGISTRATE JUDGE SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT

THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED AS SUCCESSIVE

On November 21, 2024, Randall Coleman (Petitioner), a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, constructively filed a habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (“Petition,” Dkt. No. 1).1 Petitioner is challenging his 2012 conviction after a jury found him guilty of first-degree murder, three counts of attempted murder, shooting at an inhabited dwelling, and possession of a firearm by a felon in Los Angeles County case number BA 347333, for which he was sentenced to an indeterminate term of 170 years to life. (Id. at 1, 2, 21). Petitioner is asserting four grounds for federal habeas relief: (1) trial court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.