Russo

Russo v. Federal Medical Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20255:24-cv-00748California1,670 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ALEXANDER RUSSO, et al., Case No. 24-cv-00748-PCP

8 Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

9 v. DISMISS

10 FEDERAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., et Re: Dkt. No. 128 al., 11 Defendants.

12 13 This Court dismissed plaintiff Alexander Russo’s claims against defendant Jerry Tate but 14 granted Mr. Russo leave to file an amended complaint. Mr. Russo subsequently filed his fourth 15 amended complaint, which Mr. Tate again moves to dismiss. For the following reasons, the Court 16 denies Mr. Tate’s motion. 17 BACKGROUND 18 All factual allegations from the complaint are accepted as true in resolving this motion. 19 This case stems from Mr. Russo’s employment with Federal Medical and Ben Fitzgerald, 20 of which Jim Slattery is the CEO and Mr. Tate is the owner. Abigail Woulfe supervised Mr. 21 Russo’s work for both employers. Mr. Russo asserts seven causes of action under the California 22 Labor Code, the California Unfair Competition Law, the federal Fair…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.