Anthony Avon Dabbs Sr. v. Officer Preston

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20255:22-cv-01292California375 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 ANTHONY AVON DABBS SR., Case No. 5:22-cv-01292-MEMF-KES

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER ACCEPTING IN PART REPORT

13 v.

AND RECOMMENDATION OF U.S.

14 OFFICER PRESTON, et al., MAGISTRATE JUDGE

15 Defendants.

16

17

18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and all the

19 records and files herein, along with the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of

20 the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 12). No objections to the R&R were filed, 21 and the deadline for filing such objections has passed. The Court accepts the 22 findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge, 23 with the clarification noted below. 24 The R&R found all of Plaintiff’s a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Heck-barred or, 25 alternatively, time-barred. They cannot be both, because Heck-barred claims do not 26 accrue unless and until the plaintiff’s underlying conviction has been invalidated. 27 Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 489-90 (1994) (“Under our analysis the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.