de Tagle v. Santa Clara County

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20255:24-cv-07175California1,566 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

10 ORLANDO SANCHEZ DE TAGLE, Case No. 24-cv-07175-NC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING 12 COMPLAINT WITH v. PREJUDICE BASED ON RES 13 JUDICATA

SANTA CLARA COUNTY,

14 Re: ECF 9, 11 Defendant. 15 16 Self-represented Plaintiff Orlando Sanchez de Tagle1 brings a claim for invasion of 17 privacy against Santa Clara County District Attorney Olivia Mendoza. It is not his first 18 case in this Court doing so. Upon screening the complaint as required by 28 U.S.C. 19 § 1915, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s claim is barred by res judicata based on judgment 20 entered against him in a prior action. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s complaint in this matter is 21 DISMISSED with prejudice. 22 I. BACKGROUND 23 A. de Tagle v. Santa Clara County District Attorney’s Office, No. 24-cv-03353- EKL (Prior Action)2 24 25 Plaintiff filed an action alleging District Attorney Olivia Mendoza…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.