Louis Hall III v. Riverside County

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20255:24-cv-00553California4,211 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Nathan A. Oyster (SBN 225307) E-mail: noyster@bwslaw.com Caylin W. Jones (SBN 327829) E-mail: cjones@bwslaw.com Zareh Bursalyan (SBN 356603) zbursalyan@bwslaw.com BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP 444 South Flower Street, 40th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-2942 Tel: 213.236.0600 Fax: 213.236.2700 6 Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, SHERIFF

CHAD BIANCO, CAPTAIN FLAKES,

LIEUTENANT RAMIREZ (erroneously sued as “RAMEREZ”), DEPUTY SALAZAR (erroneously sued as “SALZAR”), and DEPUTY TOVAR,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12 13 LOUIS HALL III, an individual; and Case No. 5:24-cv-00553-JGB-DTB LASHAWN D. LEWIS, an individual, Discovery Matter Plaintiff,

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

v. ORDER RIVERSIDE COUNTY; RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF’S Magistrate Judge: Hon. David T. Bristow DEPARTMENT; SHERIFF CHAD BIANCO; CAPTAIN FLAKES; Distric t J u d g e : Hon. Jesus G. Bernal LIEUTENANT RAMEREZ; DEPUTY

SALZAR; DEPUTY TOVAR;

SHERIFF DENNIS VROOM; AND

DOES 1-10, INCLUSIVE,

21 Defendant. 22 23 1. A. PURPOSES AND…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.