Arrow Electronics, Inc. v. Quantum Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20255:23-cv-03746California11,261 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

10 ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC., Case No. 23-cv-03746-NC 11 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

12 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR PARTIAL

13 QUANTUM CORPORATION, SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

14 Defendant. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 15 Re: ECF 57, 81

16

17 This case arises from a contract dispute between Plaintiff Arrow Electronics, Inc. 18 and Defendant Quantum Corporation. Arrow alleges Quantum breached their supply 19 agreement, consisting of a Master Agreement and Addendum, when Quantum failed to 20 issue purchase orders to pay for aged inventory. It also alleges that in doing so, Quantum 21 additionally breached its implied covenant of good faith and dealing. 22 Before the Court are Quantum’s motion for partial summary judgment and Arrow’s 23 motion for summary judgment. Quantum requests partial summary judgment that (1) the 24 Court cannot consider extrinsic evidence for purposes of interpreting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.