(PC)Storm
(PC)Storm v. CSATF Warden
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20251:24-cv-01287California1,504 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DIMITRI Z. STORM, No. 1:24-cv-1287 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
v.
ORDER RECOMMENDING SUMMARY
CSATF WARDEN, et al., DISMISSAL OF THIS MATTER FOR
FAILURE TO EXHAUST
Defendants. ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES See 42 U.S.C. § 1997(e)(a) ORDER RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS BE DENIED AS MOOT (ECF No. 2) PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS DUE IN
FOURTEEN DAYS
22 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 23 has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 1, 24 2, 6. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 25 636(b)(1)(B). 26 For the reasons stated below, the undersigned will recommend that…