(PC)Storm
(PC)Storm v. CSATF Warden
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DIMITRI Z. STORM, No. 1:24-cv-1287 GSA (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
13 v.
ORDER RECOMMENDING SUMMARY
14 CSATF WARDEN, et al., DISMISSAL OF THIS MATTER FOR
FAILURE TO EXHAUST
15 Defendants. ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES 16 See 42 U.S.C. § 1997(e)(a) 17 ORDER RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
18 PAUPERIS BE DENIED AS MOOT 19 (ECF No. 2) 20 PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS DUE IN
FOURTEEN DAYS
21
22 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 23 has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 1, 24 2, 6. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 25 636(b)(1)(B). 26 For the reasons stated below, the undersigned will recommend that…