Doerer

(HC) Estall v. Doerer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 20251:24-cv-01357California444 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES B. ESTELL, No. 1:24-cv-01357-KES-SKO (HC) 12 Petitioner,

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

13 RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

14 v. CORPUS, AND DIRECTING CLERK OF

COURT TO ENTER JUDGMENT AND

15 CLOSE CASE

16 DOERER, Warden, Doc. 5 17 Respondent. 18

19 20 Petitioner Charles B. Estell is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 21 with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This matter was referred 22 to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 23 On December 13, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and 24 recommendations to dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. Doc. 5. Those findings and 25 recommendations were served upon all parties and contained notice that any objections thereto 26 were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days after…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.