Doerer
(PC) Simpson v. Doerer
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MERL SIMPSON, No. 1:24-cv-01528-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT
13 v. JUDGE TO THIS ACTION 14 J. DOERER, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF
15 ACTION FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST Defendants. THE ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES 16 (ECF No. 5) 17 18 On December 13, 2024, Plaintiff filed this civil rights complaint pursuant to Bivens v. Six 19 Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 20 On December 18, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the action should 21 not be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust the administrative remedies. (ECF No. 22 5.) Plaintiff has not filed a response and the time to do has expired. 23 I. 24
SCREENING REQUIREMENT
25 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 26 governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. §…