Doer

(PC) McMillion v. Doer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20251:24-cv-01557California1,937 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SKYLER McMILLION, No. 1:24-cv-01557-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT

13 v. JUDGE TO THIS ACTION 14 J. DOER, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF

15 ACTION FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST Defendants. THE ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES 16 (ECF No. 5) 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights complaint pursuant 19 to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 20 On December 20, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the action should 21 not be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust the administrative remedies. (ECF No. 22 5.) Plaintiff has not filed a response and the time to do has expired. 23 I. 24

SCREENING REQUIREMENT

25 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 26 governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.