Graham

Compeer Financial, ACA v. Graham

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20251:25-cv-00049California1,015 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

17 18 On January 10, 2025, Plaintiffs Compeer Financial, ACA; Compeer Financial, PCA; and 19 Compeer Financial, FLCA (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint against Defendants Michael 20 Graham; Cynthia Graham; Dennis Morgan; Kristi Iness; and JD Investments (collectively 21 “Defendants”) alleging theft of funds belonging to Plaintiffs. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiffs also filed an 22 “Amended Notice of Request to Redact Documents,” on January 15, 2025.1 (Doc. 5.) Plaintiffs 23 seek leave to redact portions of Exhibits 4, 5, 7, and 8 to the complaint. (Doc. 12.) The request is 24 unopposed. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ unopposed request to redact these documents 25 will be granted.2 26 1 Plaintiffs previously filed a “Notice of Request to Seal or Redact Documents” with their complaint, seeking to redact 27 and/or seal certain documents, including portions of their complaint. (See Doc. 3) Plaintiffs’ request was denied without prejudice (Doc. 9.), and Plaintiffs have since narrowed the scope of their request (compare Doc. 12 with Doc. 3). 28 2 The Court notes that Plaintiffs have already publicly filed redacted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.