Graham

Compeer Financial, ACA v. Graham

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 20251:25-cv-00049California1,015 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

17 On January 10, 2025, Plaintiffs Compeer Financial, ACA; Compeer Financial, PCA; and Compeer Financial, FLCA (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint against Defendants Michael Graham; Cynthia Graham; Dennis Morgan; Kristi Iness; and JD Investments (collectively “Defendants”) alleging theft of funds belonging to Plaintiffs. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiffs also filed an “Amended Notice of Request to Redact Documents,” on January 15, 2025. (Doc. 5.) Plaintiffs seek leave to redact portions of Exhibits 4, 5, 7, and 8 to the complaint. (Doc. 12.) The request is unopposed. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ unopposed request to redact these documents will be granted.2 26 1 Plaintiffs previously filed a “Notice of Request to Seal or Redact Documents” with their complaint, seeking to redact and/or seal certain documents, including portions of their complaint. (See Doc. 3) Plaintiffs’ request was denied without prejudice (Doc. 9.), and Plaintiffs have since narrowed the scope of their request (compare Doc. 12 with Doc. 3). 2 The Court notes that Plaintiffs have already publicly filed redacted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.