SMKD Dallas Inc v. Shiftpixy, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL
Case No. 8:24-cv-02261-FWS-KES Date January 21, 2025 Title SMKD Dallas Inc et al v. Shiftpixy, Inc.
Present: The Honorable FRED W. SLAUGHTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Rolls Royce Paschal Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present Proceedings: (INCHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR
LACK OF PROSECUTION
is the plaintiffs responsibility to move a case toward a merits disposition.” Thomas v. Kernan, 2019 WL 8888200, at *1 (C.D. Cal. July 10, 2019) (citing Morris v. Morgan Stanley & Co., 942 F.2d 648, 652 (9th Cir. 1991)). That includes timely serving the complaint and filing a proof of Absent a showing of good cause, “[i]f a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court . . . must dismiss the action.” Fed. R. Civ. P.4(m). Here, 90 days have passed since Plaintiff filed the Complaint, yet no proof of service has…